>From rhash@vt.edu  Mon Oct 28 23:02:02 1996
Received: (from mailadm@localhost) by sable.cc.vt.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA13159 for fox@fox.cs.vt.edu; Mon, 28 Oct 1996 23:02:02 -0500
Received: from as2511-35.sl013.cns.vt.edu (as2511-35.sl013.cns.vt.edu [128.173.37.66]) by sable.cc.vt.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id XAA06291 for <fox@vt.edu>; Mon, 28 Oct 1996 23:01:56 -0500
Message-Id: <199610290401.XAA06291@sable.cc.vt.edu>
X-Sender: rhash@mail.vt.edu (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 1996 23:04:38 +0500
To: fox@vt.edu
From: Rachel Hash <rhash@vt.edu>
Subject: Meeting Minutes

Here are the Minutes of the Meeting from 10/24/96

-The Provost will be conducting meetings in dormoritories to examine student
life and each of us will be taking a turn in following her around and asking
some questions.  Terri will get her schedule from her office and will post it.

-We must ensure, thanks to the Provost's urging, that we document all our
stats with multiple sources.

-Most other committees are ahead of us and we need to come up with a long
meeting time.  For that purpose, we have sceduled one for November 12 from
8am-11am in 419 Newman.

-In regards to the undergraduate survey, the graduate survey is a great
foundation and could just be altered - i.e. taking out the "graduate" - for
the time being.  We all need to come up with two questions to add to the
survey and send them to Cathy at ctg@vt.edu, as she will be compiling all
the information.

-The intent of the survey needs to be defined according to Anne.  For us, Ed
believes it to be a way for us to establish a baseline data about students
and their knowledge.

-Anne believes the survey will be more productive if we have 4 Big, Overall
questions we want answered and then form the rest of the questions out of
these four.

-Ed talked about a couple of problems and the way we could solve them:
1.Plethera of paper
   -Web page established 
   -HEIR are reports that have been written prior to our self-study and may
be useful for     information.
  -If you have any suggestions about things that could be added to the page,
let Ed    know.
2.Handout about "Questions and Related Recommendations"
  -The middle part is simply questions that appear valuable
  -Question 1 is subtle and contains its own recommendation that we need to
attract    residential students who are female, from other nations, etc..
We need to watch out    for normative questions such as this, because they
presume a direction we have not    agreed to take.
  -A danger we need to be careful of is viewing our Self Study Topic too
narrowly so that    we ignore the bigger picture of educating.
  -Barbara voiced some frustration as she sees us getting to a point we want
to focus    on and then backing off and becoming more general.  We are
looking at one aspect    of the University and are stuyding it.  We need to
know where people are, find out    where the holes are in technology, and
then become more broad
  -Tim Luke made the point that technology is to enhance instruction, not to
replace it.  
  -Ed said that students have many different experiences - service,
technology, etc.     And these experiences may be aided by computers or
faculty who use technology.     Technology is one of the components of
learning, but not THE component.



-Anne said that the Introductory chapter is not finished yet, but she will
be working hard  on it.  That will provide us all with a bigger picture.

-Terri made the comment that the most fundamental issue is - How do we
provide the most powerful education for students?  There is a huge amount of
history for applying technology to education, and not all of it good.  Too
often we through out the baby with the bath water.  The program instruction
works but the technology tended to bore people.  Today, students don't even
know who B.F. Skinner is.  So, Terri will provide an outline of some of this
history with the help of some other "ghost" writers.

-Anne saids that the question of How education looks from the students
viewpoint needs to be addressed.

-Ed said that we are essentially dealing with a three-legged stool.
1. Computer Technology and what it is good for
2. Student Learning Styles
3. Teaching Styles
  How they fit together is very valuable.  How does computer technology fit
how people   learn and how people teach?  The virtual lab is great for some,
and not for others.
  How can technology be used to promote rich tasks of interaction while
bringing the   world to the classroom?

That's all of it.  Hope this is what you wanted.  Rachel

